|
|
Friday, March 9th, 2007
| |
1:32 am - how can you jump over your shadow when you no longer have one?
|
This compulsive desire for immortality, for a definitive immortality, revolves around a strange madness - the mania for what has achieved its goal. The mania for identity - for saturation, completion, repletion. For perfection too. The lethal illusion of perfection: hence these objects from which wear-and-tear, death or ageing have been eradicated by technology. The compact disc. It doesn't wear out, even if you use it. Terrifying, this. It's as though you'd never used it. It's as though you didn't exist. If objects no longer grow old when you touch them, you must be dead.
Baudrillard, J., The Illusion of the End, trans. Chris Turner (Polity Press, 1994).
( Guardian obituary )
( New York Times obituary )
|
|
(4 comments | comment on this)
|
| Wednesday, December 20th, 2006
| |
1:55 am - strange how potent cheap music is
|
Everyone loves sunsets. I've got a sunset photo on Flickr, which some of you may (or may not) remember. It has every cliche in the book - waves rumbling across the frame, the low duck-yolk sun catching the Statue of Liberty in silhouette and setting her torch on fire.
Not long ago, I looked in on my Flickr account and discovered to my horror that it was the photo most people seemed interested in, paying scant heed to the ones I actually thought a scrap interesting.
I suppose it's a decent enough shot, but it's almost like that Muse concert next year, if you know what I mean, all the OTT sound and fury that would be funny if they weren't taking themselves so seriously, and which is even less funny because everyone is currently falling over themselves to fork out close to a hundred dollars to see them.
But I digress. Sunsets have been in short supply lately (do they ever run out of water up there?) so perhaps I might view this one more kindly now.

Changi Beach, July 2006
And there are bad covers one hates, like Franz Ferdinand ripping apart - uh, I mean ripping through Pulp's Mis-shapes (like, that is sacred, you just don't touch a song like that) like a bunch of lads who've had one too many; and bad covers that make one wonder, case in point being Nirvana struggling through Seasons in the Sun with Kurt Cobain on drums, Dave Grohl on bass and Krist Novoselic on guitar. That they are clearly unfamiliar with the instruments is obvious, but it is instead always tempting to read a certain hesitation in the face of mortality, in how they've chosen to stumble through a song everyone takes for granted.
Nirvana - Seasons in the Sun
Strange how potent cheap music is. - Noel Coward, Private Lives
current music: The Tape vs RQM - Nuclear Sunset
|
|
(15 comments | comment on this)
|
| Tuesday, August 15th, 2006
| |
12:00 am - ghosts of spaces past
|

Not quite what I'd intended to post today, but I found these from 2003 or thereabouts and thought them still quite palatable. Unlike most of the stuff I regularly show, these really lose something when resized, so this is just a sneak preview.
( come get lost in all the detail )
|
|
(11 comments | comment on this)
|
| Saturday, August 12th, 2006
| |
3:46 am - cultural appropriation
|
|
| Saturday, July 29th, 2006
| |
1:30 am
|
Remember Singapore GaGa?

Won't be able to make it, but for the few of you who are in the vicinity, you know what to do.
Singapore GaGa is an engaging addition to the 'city film', which goes back to the 'silent' city symphonies, of which Berlin Symphony of a City (1927) is the best known. Other influential films in this style include the portraits of Tokyo contained in Chris Marker's Sunless (1983), Wim Wenders's Tokyo-Ga (1985), and Thom Anderson's assembly of 'found' footage in Los Angeles Plays Itself (2003, BIFF 2004). What links these otherwise disparate films, located on the boundary between experimental film and documentary, is the foregrounding of the city and its inhabitants as the primary subject and not merely as backdrops for the playing out of individual stories. In place of the rhythmic montage of the city symphonies, Tan Pin Pin has constructed a form of aural montage in an affectionately whimsical portrait of Singapore through its music and sounds, including announcements on public transport, eccentric street musicians, Madrasah school cheer squads, and avant-garde pianist Margaret Leng Tan, who plays on a toy piano. Singapore GaGa continues Tan Pin Pin's fascination with Singapore's daily life, also evident in earlier award-winning films such as Moving House (2001), about compulsory exhumation of grave sites; Building Dreams (2002), about Singapore's architectural history; and 80km/h (2003), which establishes the time it takes to drive across the city at 80 kilometres per hour.
- programme notes for the upcoming Brisbane International Film Festival 2006
|
|
(2 comments | comment on this)
|
| Thursday, July 27th, 2006
| |
12:03 am - wot big teeth you have, granny.
|
|
| Sunday, June 18th, 2006
| |
10:28 pm
|
|
| Saturday, June 10th, 2006
| |
11:50 pm
|
|
| Sunday, June 4th, 2006
| |
10:22 pm - fight pneumococcal disease!
|

Another of those crazy balloons they give out at weekends
All right, pop quiz! Without sneakily opening another tab and googling the word, tell me what 'pneumococcal' means.
Call it cursed stereotypes at work, but how many people out there are likely to tote a balloon and know the meaning of 'pneumococcal'? And assuming the more medically-inclined (or just plain linguaphiliac) members of the public are able to figure that part out, just how are they supposed to fight it anyway?
(Then again, this kid looks like she means business. Also, it is a word entirely worthy of Spellbound.)
Anyway, who am I to say, being the one who, at the age of 6, digested a whole sheaf of brochures about Aids when stuck at some clinic without suitable reading matter?
current music: Morrissey - Ringleader of the Tormentors
|
|
(8 comments | comment on this)
|
| Sunday, May 14th, 2006
| |
3:30 am - my newfound interests
|
It's 3:30am. Do you know what is on your LJ profile?
I wouldn't have even noticed, except for the fact that I've for some reason never listed more than 100 interests on LJ, ever. So when I accidentally clicked on my own profile, I was about to close the window in disgust - before something stabbed me in my eye.
I have 105 interests?!

(highlights mine)
Handcuffs (sure, I'd be most happy to put handcuffs on whoever did this), hugging (hell, no), paranormal activity (spare me the paranormal activity on my LJ, thanks), rescue me (from this insanity, yes)? I suppose oddness and skepticism didn't look quite as out-of-place (except that I know it would've been 'scepticism', had I typed it myself, bah).
So I drew the obvious conclusion - that the only person my password seems to have had any success locking out is my own lonesome self - and dutifully went about setting my profile to rights. Only that on the Edit Profile page, my newfound interests seem to have vanished whence they came, even as they continued to sneer tauntingly at me from the comfort of my profile page.
All right LJ, what gives?
[Edit: Now my profile seems to have gone back to normal as well. Weird. All right, anyone who found my LJ by searching for 'handcuffs' as an interest can go home now. Sorry to disappoint; nothing to see here.]
current music: Astreal - Projektion
|
|
(6 comments | comment on this)
|
| Monday, February 20th, 2006
| |
1:33 am
|

(All right, all right, so all I apparently type these days are image tags. Been sitting on this one for a few days, but eventually decided to post it.)
Elsewhere in my life, I seem to have found a way of giving myself (pleasant) surprises - i.e. I order something online, and remember having ordered something with no idea as to exactly what, and consequently get packages in the mail that are a complete mystery by the time they get here.
|
|
(7 comments | comment on this)
|
| Friday, January 27th, 2006
| |
1:09 am - home in a seed
|
The Human Ecology Design Team at MIT developed Fab Tree Hab, a proposal to grow homes from seeds (thanks for the link, spiritofnow). Admire:

Photos from http://www.archinode.com
Aesthetically and conceptually, it is quite stunningly beautiful, but it needs work on a few points, I think, if people don't want it to merely remain a beautiful idea.
1. Trees take years to grow; whereas humans typically need shelter now. I suppose the trees could be cultivated elsewhere while folks develop interest in it, but even moving an established tree isn't something you can wake up and feel like doing one day, unless you are Ascendas Land, in which case you should certainly feel free to transplant as many semi-centenarian Malayan Banyans as you like to your new Science Park II premises. Something tells me that instant trees, on the other hand, just aren't going to be able to bear the tremendous load architects are demanding of these trees.
2. Trees need land to grow on, and most urban centres don't have enough of it as it is. Cue housing estates made of a single giant tree supporting many little modular habitats woven out of tree branch lattices, but I think that was inspired by some scif-fi/fantasy movie I watched. But realistically, the sheer population density of urban (or even suburban) spaces is quite likely to do the trees in before anything else.
3. There is no means of acquiring one of these homes quickly, cheaply and easily, so it falls on the collective shoulders of a small coterie of interested parties to realise the idea. And so it never makes it past early adopter status. Which seems to be the big problem with most otherwise-inspiring architecture, really.
4. What happens to the ecosystem when you bring home a tree for its self-grafting properties, regardless of whether it is indigenous to a place, let alone a relatively urban setting? And as it is, any given tree naturally houses small animals, birds and insects - are human beings ready to let them into their homes as well? Because really, most human beings as we know them don't really have a place in the forest, not anymore.
5. Like all living creatures, trees are not impervious to death and disease. What if the arboreal equivalent of the H5N1 virus strikes just one tree? As it is, we know what the Dutch Elm Disease can do. Sure, there has to be management and inoculation plans developed in tandem with tree habitats, but as with the slew of viruses (as well as terrorist attacks, I ought to add) that has been sweeping through the world, everything that one can do is reactionary rather than genuinely pre-emptive in nature.
I had originally intended to post the link and be done with it. This has gone on way longer than it should have, and I'm going to click 'post' before I come up with point 6.
I don't think it's all bad, though. If I thought an idea was codswallop, I wouldn't have even have bothered giving it a mention here, and I hope you know that.
[Oh, look, a post with content!]
|
|
(11 comments | comment on this)
|
| Tuesday, January 24th, 2006
| |
1:11 am - condoms must be used here
|
|
| Sunday, January 22nd, 2006
| |
3:00 am
|

Somewhere in Chinatown, in the run-up to the Lunar New Year.
No, I don't know what the fire engine was doing there.
* * *
In other news, I was helping someone set up a Gmail account. The browser helpfully relayed country of origin to Google, which duly presented me with the terms of service as follows:

Uh, it's in Chinese. And not everybody in S'pore reads Chinese to begin with, much less Traditional (as opposed to Simplified) script. And it is really funny that Google should think otherwise, since it lists the country by its Malay name first (helpfully followed by its official name in parentheses). Diversity may be fun, but get your facts right, folks. Unless you really don't want people to read your TOS.
|
|
(16 comments | comment on this)
|
| Monday, January 16th, 2006
| |
1:34 am - ben sheares revisited
|
I know I posted a photo of the Sheares Bridge circa 2003. But that photo has long since been lost, most of you didn't see it anyway - and most importantly, I probably wouldn't have taken it the same way today. So let's see how our old friend's doing.
I'm quite pleased with how this one turned out:

Under the Benjamin Sheares Bridge, 2006
( the rochor road exit )
current music: Nouvelle Vague - Guns of Brixton
|
|
(14 comments | comment on this)
|
| Tuesday, November 15th, 2005
| |
11:33 pm - s'pore from a gutter
|
Has anyone ever stopped to consider what a horrendous image the green lung of a city actually conjures?
(And incidentally, the government that wants people to stop smoking also wants everyone to know how lovely it is to live in a green lung.)
Anyway, enough of this green lung rubbishing. Allow me to present the urinary tract.

S'pore from a gutter
( or not? )
current music: Meret Becker & Ars Vitalis - Jockey Full of Bourbon
|
|
(13 comments | comment on this)
|
| Thursday, November 3rd, 2005
| |
6:04 pm - eid mubarak!
|
|
| Sunday, October 9th, 2005
| |
11:45 pm - o my prophetic soul
|
I'm generally not in the business of repeating myself, but this seems an appropriate point to do so.
The world needs earthquake-resistant, hurricane-resistant and flood-resistant housing more than ever.

The basic construction technique involves filling sandbags with earth and laying them in circular courses that are corbelled near the top to form a dome. Barbed wire laid between courses prevents the sandbags from shifting and provides earthquake resistance. Ironically, it is the materials of war — sandbags and barbed wire — that bind together traditional earth architecture with contemporary safety requirements.
The system uses the timeless forms of arches, domes, and vaults to create single and double-curvature shell structures that are both strong and beautiful. In addition to providing earthquake resistance, the aerodynamic form resists hurricanes. The use of sandbags aids flood resistance, and the earth itself provides insulation and fireproofing.
From http://www.architectureweek.com/2004/1201/news_1-3.html
Original post is here: http://www.livejournal.com/users/rekraft/89366.html
|
|
(5 comments | comment on this)
|
| Monday, August 8th, 2005
| |
1:40 pm - see; no touch
|
Are Singaporeans the only nation of people who, when asked if they want more public space, actually say no??!
In their print edition, the Straits Times reported that 9 out of 10 people they polled said that they wanted the Istana kept out of bounds to the public except on special occasions. It's slightly flabbergasting to see the same sentiment being reflected in their online poll:

Granted I also have a problem with how the whole idea of making the Istana grounds public came up. I suppose I can see some reason for opposition to Orchard Road retailers bringing up the idea of having shops and fashion shows on presidential grounds. But that doesn't mean that the grounds can't be made accessible on a much more regular basis as a public place right in the middle of the city. One doesn't have to take Central Park as their model - in fact, one needn't even look further than the Bots. And until that happens, forget the guff about respecting the Istana as a seat of tradition - it isn't even really on most people's radars now simply because it's out of bounds and to all intents and purposes invisible to most people.
But then again, the people who want to be kept out of the Istana are probably the same people who seem fairly undisturbed by the fact that all but a small fraction of the new National Library building remains inaccessible to the public.
current mood: flabbergasted
|
|
(9 comments | comment on this)
|
| Sunday, July 24th, 2005
| |
1:51 am
|
When I came to the United States to live as a teenager, I entered a world of profligacy and seeming wanton abandon of things in a take-make-waste production system, with a cradle-to-grave "throw it away" philosophy. I think this, in many ways, was the result of nuclear threat, something I did not live through ... When you sense that everything could end in an instant, you live as if there might not be a tomorrow. This became embedded in the culture - modern culture actually created geopolitical and physical threats (global terrorism, weapons of mass destruction, biological warfare) that could destroy us all tomorrow - so many industrialised countries have a "get it while we can" attitude rather than a continuous long-term prosperity in mind.
William McDonough on economy, ecology and equity
|
|
(4 comments | comment on this)
|
|
|
|
|